Wednesday, October 8, 2008

DID YOU KNOW?

That many of the state foster care agencies do not have adequately trained individuals? This was posted on a friend's website. I was flabbergasted. Anyone can perform adoptions of any kind without any training in social work. That alone sickens me.

Here is the link. Here is the story.

Many DSS caseworkers lacked experience when hired

Carol Thompson 10-01-2008


by Carol Thompson

A typist, a fitness instructor, a gym teacher, a postal worker, and a debt collector all became caseworkers for the Oswego County Department of Social Services. Two others worked in the office of the District Attorney and one is the wife of the District Attorney.

The Valley News made the request for the applications and/or resumes of all caseworkers Aug. 22, 2008, one week before the death of 11-year-old Erin Maxwell.

State Police say Erin was found in deplorable conditions with bags of garbage on the porch and over a hundred cats living inside the home. Friday, Salvatore Lanza, the family’s attorney, produced the official death certificate that shows Erin died of asphyxia as the primary cause of death. Sexual trauma is listed as a contributing factor.

The child’s home had been visited by a caseworker in 2006 and reportedly twice in previous years. One resident has been said to have called agencies in more recent months and alleged that he was told that they cannot tell others how to live.

Since the time it was learned that DSS had visited the home, the department has come under fire from the public for not removing Erin from the deplorable conditions.

The name of the caseworker involved in the Maxwell case has not been released, not even to Legislature Chairman Barry Leemann, who said he has been given little information in regard to the circumstances surrounding the girl’s death.

The applications provided by the county indicate that while all caseworkers now have a college degree, one-half of them had no experience in human services or a related field when hired and several had only a minimal amount of experience when hired.

Others came to the department well qualified with experience from other social-service agencies and some were welfare examiners prior to taking the civil-service test for the caseworker position.

Caseworkers are hired to entry-level positions, according to information provided by the county, at a current pay rate of $18.83 per hour. In-service training is provided and they work under the general supervision of a senior caseworker.

In order to qualify for the civil-service test, an applicant must have a been graduated from a regionally accredited or New York State registered college or university with a bachelor’s degree in psychology, sociology, social work, human services, or a closely related field; or graduation from a regionally accredited or New York State registered college or university with a bachelor’s degree including 30 credit hours in the behavioral sciences.

One applicant was graduated with a bachelor’s degree in speech pathology with the only work experience listed as that of the owner of a fast-food restaurant. Another applicant with a degree in English worked as a bank teller, as a mental-health counselor for an apartment treatment program, and three years as a paint-project advisor with the home-improvement store Chase-Pitkin prior to receiving employment with the county.

An applicant with college credit but no degree worked as a bill collector, an insurance agent, a forklift operator, and “ran a machine that paints the various wall accessories” prior to being hired as a caseworker. That application did list a two-month internship with the county probation department.

The caseworker exam does provide for a combination of education and experience.

According to Patty Familo of the county personnel office, there was a time when candidates could apply prior to finishing their required college course work. “Sometimes what we did was announce it conditionally,” she said. “You could apply if you were about to finish your degree.”

Some counties go beyond the state’s minimum qualifications and mandate a year of actual Social Service experience.

“We don’t do that,” Ms. Familo said. “If we wanted to and we had the candidate pool, we could raise the qualifications. We’ve never had such an overwhelming response that we’ve had the luxury to do that.”

Ms. Familo said that while she believes Oswego County requires qualifications that are higher than some, she acknowledged that there are those who may have qualifications that are higher than the county.

Leemann said the legislators do not get into the every-day operations of the Department of Social Services but added that it may warrant a further review.

“If there appears to be a problem, the legislators will have to look into it,” he said.

The Valley News requested the applications of all caseworkers based on another allegation from another person that DSS had failed to respond properly to situation similar to the Maxwell case.

In that matter, an infant was living in a cockroach-infested home with a dozen cats, a pit-bull, and a pet rat that was allowed to roam freely through the home.

The complainant was able to provide photographs of the living conditions as well as voice messages from hospital personnel who were assisting with efforts to remove the child from the home.

Although the complainant alleges that DSS refused to remove the child from the home, the father of the child, who resided in another county, was able to recently secure custody and the child is now living in a clean environment.

FOSTER CARE AND TRANSPARENCY

Indiana has had its issues with foster care. It seems that foster care adoption has been in the news with the recent deaths of two foster care adoptees. Everyone has heard the horror stories about Ms. Bowman. Michigan's foster care system has settled a lawsuit. Here are the terms of that agreement:
Create a specific children's services office to oversee foster care administration.

Create a 24-hour centralized hotline for calls about abuse and neglect.

Hire more foster care workers and caseworkers to reduce caseloads.

Reduce the amount of time between removing a child and either reunification or removing parental rights.

Reduce the amount of time between removing parental rights and adoption.

Register family members with DHS to receive support services for caring for a child.

Ensure better access to health care, including mental health; appoint a medical director for foster children; reduce the use of psychotropic medicines as discipline.

Recruit and retain more foster parents and adoptive families, and provide better oversight of foster homes.

The DC area is also facing heat and are itching to make changes in its system because of the Bowman case and another case where another child died. We are throwing money at the foster care system but there is no accountability for those funds or those children. Its time that we get that.

In Oklahoma, Children's Rights has filed a lawsuit against the Department of Human Services for the issues within their department. There is a recent case where DHS worker, Antiffany Daniels, walked into a Catholic Charities maternity home and took a newborn from the care of his mother and grandmother. This worker should not even be working for this organization due to financial issues of her own. Ms. Daniels Fears has several charges of theft by check in Oklahoma and Arkansas. She also has several bad debt issues as well. These companies have filed lawsuit against her. She was also fired from the Oklahoma's Attorney General's office. Its my understanding this case has now been added to the lawsuit. This was an unlawful seizure of the child. It is also my understanding that this woman is under investigation. Yet the child and mother continue to be separated. The DHS has accused the mother of drug addiction. When she was test by DHS, it was positive but when the mother was tested by an independent lab, those tests were negative. The tests were taken within a hour and half of each other.

Indiana too has had its share of problems with its foster care system. We as a society owe it to children in foster care to give them the best. The best might be adoption from foster care or best might be a reunion with their families. We must protect these children while they are in the care. They do not need to suffer even more so.

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS?

Do you think that adoptive parents over the age of fifty should be allowed to adopt? This situation is a hard one. I do feel for these adoptive parents. I can see if they were raising their own grandchild if their daughter was incapacitated. Do you think that parents such as these should be allowed to adopt an infant? These foster parents would have been in their eighties when this infant would be an adult. I take issue with that. They may die in this span of years. So do I agree with it? No I don't. What is your opinion?

Here is the link. Here is the story.

Published: October 7, 2008

Nine-month-old Nevaeh is a thief.

In a matter of seconds, the little girl will steal your heart.

That's what happened to Ron and Karen Bell.

In March, the Bells agreed to bring Nevaeh — that's "heaven" spelled backwards — into their Statesville home as foster parents.

Nevaeh's mother, the Bells said, was 14 when she gave birth to the girl in January. The baby's father, a 28-year-old from West Virginia, has never faced charges, despite impregnating the 13-year-old girl, the Bells said.

If the age of Nevaeh's birth mother was strike one against the child before she was even born, strike two was the teen's use of drugs and alcohol during her pregnancy, they said.

The Bells believe the third strike will come in the form of an Iredell County Department of Social Services worker coming to their front door and asking them to hand over Nevaeh.

"It could happen any day," Ron said. "Any car that drives down that street could be the one coming to take her away."

Shortly after birth, Nevaeh was diagnosed with drug withdrawal problems and fetal alcohol syndrome, the Bells said. She spent several weeks in the hospital before the Bells took her in, joining two girls for whom the Bells have served as surrogate parents for the past two years.

They were told it would be a temporary arrangement. So with time on their hands, they agreed.
That's when the little girl stole their hearts.

"We fell in love with her," Karen said.

Ron and Karen are 62 and 58, respectively, but both have passed physical examinations with flying colors. This is true despite Ron's having had bypass surgery and Karen's diabetes.

Their age is not supposed to be a factor in deciding their fitness as adoptive parents.

Indeed, the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services encourages folks from all backgrounds to adopt.

Under the heading of "Who can adopt?" on the DHHS Web site, the department vaguely addresses the issue of age. "Adopting families can be older or younger, wealthy or of modest income, two-parent or single-parent," the site page reads in part. "The primary requirement for adoption is that you can provide a healthy, loving and nurturing home for a child."

And the Bells say they have dedicated themselves to doing exactly that.

But, they say, their age has come up.

They contend that Angela Williams, an Iredell County DSS supervisor, told them they would not be considered as prospective adoptive parents for Nevaeh "because we were too old and had health problems," Ron said.

When asked by the R&L, DSS Director Donald Wall said he could not discuss specifics of the case. When asked general questions about the department's adoption procedures or age requirements, Wall hung up the phone.

On Oct. 1, the Bells were told by the state that they were being turned down as adoptive parents of Nevaeh. They were told to contact the Iredell DSS to find out the reasons for their rejection.

The Bells say DSS won't tell them either and that efforts to contact Wall have given them the impression he was intentionally ignoring them. Ron Bell said he has left about a half-dozen phone messages for Wall and written him three different letters.

"I don't know why he won't call us back," Bell said. "But you'd think that if they were worried about the best interest of the child, we would all be able to talk about this."

Karen Bell said that while they love Nevaeh, it is not their love that is driving their desire for the baby to stay with them.

"She's comfortable with us. She is thriving with us," she said. "Nevaeh is part of our family. Her personality is already made and it includes what she has learned here."

Her husband agrees.

"I would do anything for that little baby," he said, adding that he has already bought Nevaeh's Halloween costume.

"It's a pumpkin," he said with a hint of both joy and concern in his voice. "We just hope she gets to use it."

WHAT THE HECK?

Why is the term "birthmother" even in this article? This woman was not a "birthmother." She was the mother of this child. Period. There was no adoption. There was no relinquishment. The natural father was raising this child. If you even call it raising. He beat this child to death. There were enough complaints.

Sadly this is an example of how the military does close ranks when it comes to one of their own. I know because I have seen it. This child should have been protected. It sounds like the father should not have ever been allowed to raise this child.

Here is the story and the link.

Mother of Slain Daughter Files Suit Against Government

By Ron Mizutani


The mother of a young girl allegedly beaten to death by her father has filed a lawsuit against the United States government. The suit claims the government failed to report suspicion of abuse to authorities. Tarshia Williams believes enough people knew Schofield Barracks soldier Naeem Williams and his wife Delilah were abusing her daughter.

Tarshia Williams describes the child she sees in pictures taken shortly before she was killed.

"She looked so sad and unhappy in this picture and I just knew something was going on," said Williams in an interview in 2005.

On July 16, 2005, Talia Williams was found in a blood-stained home at Wheeler Army Airfield.An autopsy revealed she died from "inflicted head trauma due to battered child syndrome." The attorney for the child and her birth mother says there was much evidence of abuse. A week before her death a chilling phone call between the girl's step-mother and a cousin.

"The step-mother reported that the father was brutally torturing and beating the child and in fact the cousin heard in the background the child screaming," said attorney Mark Davis.

The cousin anonymously called state authorities.

"The child protective services immediately started looking through their records and found no evidence of the a child by this name they couldn't track the child down," said Davis.

For seven months, Talia was under the care of her father Naeeem Williams, a Schofield soldier and his wife Delilah. In that time there were other reports of suspected abuse.

"We know that neighbors had called the police, we know that they had appeared at certain doctors appointments with suspicions of allegations of child abuse," said Davis "I think there were 3 or 4 incidents with the MPS where they were called out there."

State agencies were never contacted, although Davis says the father's commander was informed.

"It's not up to a commanding officer or military police to investigate child abuse," said Davis.

In the end, Talia suffered. According to court documents, Delilah Williams told police her husband spanked Talia with his belt for wetting herself. She said blood splattered throughout the home was caused by her husband whipping Talia with his belt on her back bursting open scars.

"It was certainly without any questions whatsoever enough to trigger their obligations to report this to the state agencies," said Davis.

Delilah Williams pled guilty to first degree murder in 2006. Naeem Williams faces two counts of first degree murder which could get him the death penalty.

CATHOLIC CHARITIES

I pay attention to Catholic Charities across the country. Why? They affect our records in Indiana. They own a majority of our records in Indiana. They are adamantly against any of us having access to those records.

I am sure that they do good works but not when it comes to adoptees and their families. Many have said that the reason that they are against open adoptee access is to prevent further exposure of the priest scandal. In fact, that priest scandal is still in the news. Victims are now starting to get paid for some of the many lawsuits.

In San Francisco, they are ending a two year relationship with a gay adoption agency. What Catholic Charities and other agencies do not understand is that if you accept federal funds, you can't discriminate against gays, women or any other group of people.

Catholic Charities and various parishes have also been sued on birth control issues. They do not allow the health insurance companies to provide birth control to their female employees. I have seen countless lawsuits against them for this issue.

They are also being sued for age discrimination. This organization seems to be well known for its discrimination against various groups of people. Whether you be an adoptee, gay, natural parent, woman, or elderly, you are just wrong. Its time to end this kind of discriminatory action against people. If you receive federal funds, you can't discriminate.

Sunday, October 5, 2008

EXCELLENT ARTICLE

This article is an excellent one. It makes one think. I do not personally like the ACLU since they are the ones that also block adoptee access. I do think the issues concerning teen pregnancy should be addressed. It is okay to attack Jamie Lynn but not okay to attack Bristol. I agree with not attacking Bristol but not at the expense of not discussing the issue of teen pregnancy.

Here is the article:

NOTIONS: A pregnant GOP primer on civil liberties: Who decides?
Sat. September 06 - 2008
Bruce Hetrick
Special to IBJ

Years ago, I wrote an article about Sheila Suess Kennedy, an Indianapolis author who’d written a book called “What’s a Nice Republican Girl Like Me Doing in the ACLU?”

I didn’t know Sheila. I didn’t know much about the American Civil Lib
erties Union, either. So I stopped by her office (she directed the organization’s Indiana chapter back then) for an education.

Sheila, now a faculty member at the Indiana University School of Public and Environmental Affairs at IUPUI, explained to me that she’d grown up a Goldwater Republican. And how that brand of Republicanism was, in her view, consistent with the mission of the ACLU: to ensure that a limited government never takes away our civil liberties, even when the majority of citizens would like the government to do so. In deciding whether government is overstepping its bounds, Sheila said, it often comes down to a simple question: “Who decides?”

Who decides whether a preacher may shout his hallelujahs on a street corner?

Who decides whom I may love and marry?


Who decides whether a couple may adopt a child?

Who decides what we may say, write and read?

Who decides which god or gods we may worship—or choose not to?

Who decides whether we may pack Colt 45s?

Who decides when life begins?

Sheila said that the late Sen. Goldwater and the ACLU are in synch on this one: In our sweet Land of Liberty, under its Bill of Rights, we, not Big Brother, should have the right to decide for ourselves.

She also said, with deep regret, that Goldwater Republicanism is dead and gone, buried by those who would employ the power of government to impose their own brand of morality.

I remembered Sheila’s civil liberties lecture last week, as Sen. John McCain announced that socially conservative Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin would be his running mate and we subsequently learned that Palin’s 17-year-old unwed daughter is pregnant.

I have two regrets over the hullabaloo that ensued: One, that young Bristol Palin, her boyfriend and their families were pilloried in the public square as a consequence of her mother’s candidacy; and two, that the tabloid treatment of this circus sideshow overshadowed the bigger issue—a civil liberties choice that may affect your freedom and mine for decades to come.


Last week, during an interview with Washington Post editors, McCain campaign manager Rick Davis said, “This election is not about issues. This election is about a composite view of what people take away from these candidates.”

With an economy in tatters, unemployment raging, home foreclosures skyrocketing, tens of millions of Americans without health insurance, a widening gap between haves and have-nots, and a tarnished U.S. image around the world, Davis is wrong. The election is about issues.

And with all the talk about fighting for freedom, one issue should be a reminder of what freedom means. Four examples:

As Sarah Palin was introduced to the nation, we learned that she made a choice to give birth to a son, knowing full well that he would have Down syndrome.

I honor her freedom to choose.

As Bristol Palin’s pregnancy was announced to the nation, we learned that she’s made a choice to keep her child and marry the father.

I honor her freedom to choose.

When Sen. Barrack Obama was asked by Rev. Rick Warren when life begins, he said such knowledge is “above my pay grade”—in other words it’s divine knowledge, not mortal, and certainly not governmental.

I honor his freedom to choose.

When my wife and I became pregnant,
we knew there was a chance our twin sons could inherit my eye cancer and suffer blindness. We chose life (and our sons have sight!).

I celebrate our freedom to choose—and our choice—every day.

But we’ve also learned that McCain and Palin would deny such freedom of choice to others—replacing it with a government mandate that all pregnant women must give birth, even in cases of rape or incest.

And we’ve learned that they oppose the comprehensive sex-education programs that give teens like Bristol and her boyfriend more choices in avoiding pregnancy.

And we’ve learned that, while they support Bristol and her boyfriend’s planned marriage, they, along with Sens. Barack Obama and Joseph Biden, believe government should continue to deny the same privilege of marriage for same-sex couples.

Knowing all that, even if civil liberties and related public policies don’t rise to the level of Rick Davis’ “irrelevant” campaign issues, they’re fair game for our “composite view of the candidates.”

Which brings us back to Sheila’s question: Who decides? You? Or Big Brother?

Election Day is Nov. 4. Sorry Sheila, Barry Goldwater is not on the ballot. •

FELLOW COLEMAN MOMS AND BABES

It seems that I need to catch up with this blog. I write predominately on my Adoption and Its Triad blog. I want to acknowledge that we have had several new members to Coleman Moms and Babes email list. We are getting bigger and bigger.

A new legislative year is about to start. With that comes new legislators. If you are in Indiana, its time to start writing to find out where they stand on this issue. Its time to begin writing again. You can use the links to the side of this post to help with that. You can also find many copies of letters that I have used in my efforts.

So if you want additional help, advise or just support, please join the email list for either Coleman Moms and Babes or Indiana Open.